|
|
||||||
|
#1
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Are there seperate installation files for 32 bit and 64 bit of BizTalk 2006 or while installing, BizTalk will determine which one to install based on OS. Can anybody clarify this. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Its a while since I did a 64-bit install of BizTalk, but I seem to remember that the install CD includes both versions and that it figures out the correct install depending on the target system (but I could be wrong on that, I'd be happy for that statement to be clarified). A few points to take away: * BizTalk supports both 32- and 64-bit architectures out of the box.; Itanium (ia64) is not supported, but x64 (AMD64 and EM64T) architectures are. This applies to the BizTalk runtime only and not the SQL Server database - you can run SQL Server on any supported hardware. * The BizTalk runtime can execute in 32-bit mode using the WOW64 service to emulate a 32-bit runtime environment. On an x64 architecture, WOW64 switches the processor hardware from its 64-bit mode to compatibility mode when it’s time to execute a 32-bit thread, and then handles the switch back to 64-bit mode. No expensive emulation is required for WOW64 on x64 in comparision to Itanium. For more information, see the Wikipedia entry on WOW64. * Installation is relatively simple and requires no additional work. If you are downloading the CAB file prior to installation (rather than letting the installer download from the web), make sure that you get the 64-bit version, rather than the 32-bit version. * On a 64-bit architecture, Setup installs the 32-bit elements into the ‘Program Files (x86)’ directory, rather than the standard ‘Program Files’ directory. When developing projects, I would suggest targeting your assemblies to GAC_MSIL, rather than GAC_32 (32-bit) or GAC_64 (64-bit); that way, the JIT compiler can target your assembly to the correct version of the CLR at runtime and you don't have to worry about compiling to the correct architecture when developing. I blogged on the topic of 64-bit BizTalk sometime last year: http://www.modhul.com/2007/07/28/biz...4-bit-machine/ Be aware though, there are a few caveats with 64-bit BizTalk, e.g. the BizTalk Explorer OM doesn't work: http://www.modhul.com/2007/08/19/biz...t-environment/ Hope this helps, Nick. On Oct 8, 10:59 am, Help Needed <HelpNee> wrote: [..] |
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Certified BizTalk Resources : BizTalk 2006 R2, 2006, 2004, 2002, 2009(beta) We are a team of developers whom are experts/certified within the Microsoft .Net space specializing in BizTalk integrations. We guarantee success. * BizTalk 2009... |
|
| Is BizTalk Server 2006 Backwards Compatible with BizTalk 2004 appl Hello, Is BizTalk Server 2006 backwards compatible with BizTalk Server 2004 applications? Going forward in the future we will be upgrading to the Latest BizTalk Server which... |
|
| Data at the root level is invalid (Biztalk 2006) (biztalk 2004) We have an orchestration that posts data to a url and receives data using a flat file disassembler. The orchestration works well on Biztalk 2004. But on 2006 the same... |
|
| BizTalk Partner Edition is no longer available as of the BizTalk 2006 release On page [..] is undisclosed information: " . BizTalk Partner Edition is no longer available as of the BizTalk 2006 release. Customers looking for BizTalk Partner Edition... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 PM. | Privacy Policy
|