|
|
||||||
|
#1
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
We are setting up two Windows Servers as dummy servers as part of a disaster recovery solution (Waiting ready and setup in case of disaster in the office). These servers are to be setup in the same way as two office servers where one is the domain controller, and the other is running exchange. Occasionally a restore will be made from a backup tape created in the office to the backup, to make sure that the dummy servers are functioning as expected. This all seemed to make sense to me, however, due to my slight lack of knowledge in setting up email and domains on Windows 2003 Server, in the event of a disaster I am not sure what would actually happen to get things up and going again. Assuming we have a broadband connection where the dummy servers are and we were to perform a restore of exchange etc, would email just carry on working at the new location? Forgive me if this a dumb question, but is there anything location dependent on the way exchange would collect it's email. To put it another way, if I was to take the servers from the office, and move them somewhere else onto a different broadband connection, would they just carry on working? I hope this question kind of makes sense and please forgive me if it is stupid. Thanks. David |
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
"news.microsoft.com" <no> wrote in message
news:4784 > Hi there, > > We are setting up two Windows Servers as dummy servers as part of a disaster > recovery solution (Waiting ready and setup in case of disaster in the > office). These servers are to be setup in the same way as two office servers > where one is the domain controller, and the other is running exchange. > > Occasionally a restore will be made from a backup tape created in the office > to the backup, to make sure that the dummy servers are functioning as > expected. > > This all seemed to make sense to me, however, due to my slight lack of > knowledge in setting up email and domains on Windows 2003 Server, in the > event of a disaster I am not sure what would actually happen to get things > up and going again. > > Assuming we have a broadband connection where the dummy servers are and we > were to perform a restore of exchange etc, would email just carry on working > at the new location? > > Forgive me if this a dumb question, but is there anything location dependent > on the way exchange would collect it's email. > > To put it another way, if I was to take the servers from the office, and > move them somewhere else onto a different broadband connection, would they > just carry on working? > > I hope this question kind of makes sense and please forgive me if it is > stupid. > > Thanks. > > David Your alternative site must obtain the same external IP address as the main site, or else you must get your MX record changed (which could take some time to propagate). |
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
"Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can> wrote in message
news:4784 > Your alternative site must obtain the same external IP address as the > main site, or else you must get your MX record changed (which could > take some time to propagate). OK thank you for that. So in reality, would they need broadband provided by the same company. How likely is it that a static IP address can be transferred to another location? Any idea what other companies do to keep email working in the event of failure of their main server(s) and they have backup servers in place to which operation switches to? |
|
#4
|
|
|
|
|
"news.microsoft.com" <no> wrote in message
news:3684 > > "Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can> wrote in message > news:4784 > > Your alternative site must obtain the same external IP address as the > > main site, or else you must get your MX record changed (which could > > take some time to propagate). >> OK thank you for that. So in reality, would they need broadband provided by > the same company. How likely is it that a static IP address can be > transferred to another location? > > Any idea what other companies do to keep email working in the event of > failure of their main server(s) and they have backup servers in place to > which operation switches to? >> The easiest way is to make an arrangement with your ISP so that you can switch your fixed IP address from one location to another. Your ISP will tell you if he can do it. |
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
You can set up a secondary MX record to be used if the first is unreachable,
Anthony "Pegasus (MVP)" <I.can> wrote in message news:1888 [..] |
|
#6
|
|
|
|
|
"Anthony" <anthony.spam> wrote in message
news:4784 > You can set up a secondary MX record to be used if the first is > unreachable, > Anthony Ahh now that is interesting. Thanks for all the comments. |
|
#7
|
|
|
|
|
"Anthony" <anthony.spam> wrote in message
news:4784 > You can set up a secondary MX record to be used if the first is > unreachable, > Anthony Actually one question on that. What if the backup server that the MX record points to is not turned on most of the time (only in the event of a disaster). Lets say there is some temporary problems with the first server, and then it tries to deliver to the second rather then retrying the first later, could this cause some problems? David |
|
#8
|
|
|
|
|
The sending server is going to try to send to one of the servers listed as
MX. If none are available, it will go in a queue to try again later Anthony "news.microsoft.com" <no> wrote in message news:1888 [..] |
|
#9
|
|
|
|
|
So have you tried this plan? How do you plan on keeping AD in sync?
Anthony wrote: [..] |
|
#10
|
|
|
|
|
"daveberm" <david.bermingham> wrote in message
news:4800 > So have you tried this plan? How do you plan on keeping AD in sync? > What is AD? Thanks |
|
#11
|
|
|
|
|
Active Directory. This is the database that holds all of your user
accounts and Exchange configuration among other things. news.microsoft.com wrote: [..] |
|
#12
|
|
|
|
|
>> > So have you tried this plan? How do you plan on keeping AD in sync?
Ahh, very good question (Now that I know what AD is), and one that I would welcome your opinion. In the first instance, this is only a DR recovery. So in the event of a disaster, we would have two servers ready and waiting to recover the data to. I assumed that as part of a restore (backup up using veritas Backup Exec 9.1) from the most recent tape backup, the AD would also be restored (correct me if I am wrong). The idea of having the servers ready and waiting is that we have a tested backup solution in place. But then we were looking to take it to another level. In this instance we were going to install another server into the office which is running R2. Now I am told this has differential file synchronisation ( a feature available in UNIX for a long time). By linking up the backup and live server over the VPN, we can keep the backup server up to date. Now this is what I have been told anyway. Does this make sense? |
|
#13
|
|
|
|
|
If the DC is in the same domain, then AD will automatically keep the DC
in sync. The syncronization service I believe you are refering to is DFS, and is described here... http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...s/default.mspx It may help you keep your file server in sync, but it can't do databases such as Exchange. You will still need to rely on backup and recover unless you go with a third party data replication product. If you are using Veritas Backup Exec, then I would check with them to see how they would suggest you plan and test for disaster recovery of your Exchange server. news.microsoft.com wrote: [..] |
|
#14
|
|
|
|
|
"daveberm" <david.bermingham> wrote in message
news:2600 > If the DC is in the same domain, then AD will automatically keep the DC > in sync. The syncronization service I believe you are refering to is > DFS, and is described here... > > [..] > > It may help you keep your file server in sync, but it can't do > databases such as Exchange. You will still need to rely on backup and > recover unless you go with a third party data replication product. > > If you are using Veritas Backup Exec, then I would check with them to > see how they would suggest you plan and test for disaster recovery of > your Exchange server. All very good points there and thanks for that. I was told that the latest version of exchange does now support the file replication, but we had already prepared to have to restore Exchange from tape. My understanding of Veritas is that it has the ability to backup exchange as when using the software you can choose to backup the exchange databases. I assume this is OK, but maybe I will check with Veritas (now Symantec) on this point. Thanks again and any other input welcome. D. |
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Utility to check domain servers time, all servers in the domain Hello all, The end of daylight savings time has made me aware an utility is needed to monitor all servers in a domain and provide a display. from there the time rollover... |
|
| Question re Backup domain servers I have a network that was set up years ago using a W2K server as a fileserver and as the PDC, I also have another computer (W2K) as a backup domain controler. That second... |
|
| Is there any tool to enumerate all servers in a domain, including hidden servers? We have most of our servers hidden for security reasons. Is there any way to enumerate all servers, including hidden ones? |
|
| How to setup a domain with 2 servers in VPC ? Configuration - Virtual PC 2004 SP1 - Host : Windows XP SP2 - Guest : Windows Server 2003 Domain controller + Windows Server 2003 member server in the same domain. What's... |
|
| swithing servers i would like to know if i can downgrade from windows xp to windows 2000. if so i keep getting a message that this is a older version than the present windows i am am using,... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 PM. | Privacy Policy
|