|
|
||||||
|
#1
|
|
|
|
|
Why is no one dressing this issue? I have seen many places where this is
starting to be a hot topic. I did all the required checks and my system said it was good to go. I can only intall Vista on a IDE Drive but not my SATA Drive. IF I install on SATA it fails but if use the IDE with the SATA drives attached it see and accesses the SATA drives just find. It seems to be alot of finger pointing going on with no solution that fixes all. What does XP have that Vista doesn't? And, Yes I have tried all of the current recommended procedures to install VISTA with the updated drivers. NO I do not have a GigaByte, or any of the current known failed systems just cannot install to SATA. |
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
Libertybell12:
Find the appropiate files for building the "F6 disk" from your motherboard manufacturer site. During Vista install, when it asks you about additional drivers (or something like that), use your floppy disk with the proper drivers for your SATA Disk. That should do it. Carlos "Libertybell12" wrote: [..] |
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
I've made several posts on this subject and the culprit was the hard drive
partioning. Long story made short or you can search thru this ng and find my posts. If loading drivers at the F6 prompt does not do the trick - and I doubt it will - since Vista see's the drive. 1. Use a boot disk that has the FDISK program on it that recognizes partitions >67Gb ( www.bootdisk.com ) 2. Partition the disk using the boot disk in DOS 3. Boot up system using Vista DVD 4. Format SATA disk using the disk tools on the Vista install screen 5. Perform clean install now and see if it doesn't get thru the first reboot. Don't ask. But my two Samsung disks were evidently partitioned with some kind of overlay from the factory. They worked fine for storage purposes but come to find out, I could not install an OS to them WinXP or Vista in any configuration - alone or with others. Had Asus, NVIDIA and Samsung all scratching their bald heads on this one. After the drives were FDISK'd using a Win98/WinXP boot disc - all is well and both drives are in the system and I have Vista x64 and x86 installed on them. It worked for me - it just may work for you, Bob S. "Libertybell12" <Libertybell12> wrote in message news:257b [..] |
|
#4
|
|
|
|
|
An alternative to this is simply to disconnect all drives except for the
intended installation drive. Perform the install and then reconnect any additional drives. The problem is that any drive above the installation drive that is formatted as a Logical drive has an 8MB Unallocated space preceding the Allocated space. For some reason, the Vista Installation disk will attempt to load the boot sequence into this unallocated space on first and then finish on the desired drive. This results in a corrupted boot sequence. The installation may, or may not actually take place on the intended drive and may be found to boot correctly if booted from the DVD drive instead of the Hard Drive once installation is complete. For whatever reason, it does not do this on all platform configurations with mixtures of SATA/PATA and IDE drives. Unfortunately, no patch will fix the installation DVD. "Libertybell12" <Libertybell12> wrote in message news:257b [..] |
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
Nice takeoff.
|
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Hi everybody Somewhere down the line it was doubted by a Microsoft MVP that 4 year old motherboards with a legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID controller would be supported... |
|
| Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Hi everybody Somewhere down the line it was doubted by a Microsoft MVP that 4 year old motherboards with a legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID controller would be supported... |
|
| Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Hi everybody Somewhere down the line it was doubted by a Microsoft MVP that 4 year old motherboards with a legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID controller would be supported... |
|
| Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Hi everybody Somewhere down the line it was doubted by a Microsoft MVP that 4 year old motherboards with a legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID controller would be supported... |
|
| Does x64 require a SATA RAID Driver to install non-RAID SATA Drive I am very confused with the fact that I have found no concrete area where it says if you need to have RAID Drivers for installing normal SATA Drives that aren't on a RAID. I... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM. | Privacy Policy
|