|
|
||||||
|
#1
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Mr. Expert. I did read all the information and I still have the same problem. I'm just an average senior and not an expert but I'm not stupid either. I do read and quite well in fact. Can you really offer help or just attitude? Feel free to e-mail some "simple" instructions.
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia wrote:
> Yes, Mr. Expert. I did read all the information and I still have the > same problem. I'm just an average senior and not an expert but I'm > not stupid either. I do read and quite well in fact. Can you really > offer help or just attitude? Feel free to e-mail some "simple" > instructions. Perhaps if you responded to the original thread so we would know what you were speaking of... |
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia wrote:
> Yes, Mr. Expert. I did read all the information and I still have the > same problem. I'm just an average senior and not an expert but I'm > not stupid either. I do read and quite well in fact. Can you really > offer help or just attitude? Feel free to e-mail some "simple" > instructions. Aha! You are the one who posted: "Everyone seems to be having the same problem that I have with the Sasser patch. How many times will it take for MS to see that their solution isn't accepted by their own system? Bummer!!!!!!Do we have a patch for the patch? Security update for XP KB835732" And you think I have an attitude? Was there even a question in what you posted? I see the question marks, so let me answer what you asked in the manner with which it was asked: "How many times will it take for MS to see that their solution isn't accepted by their own system?" Since it has been accepted by hundreds of thousands of machines without problems, I'm guessing they are having trouble seeing your point of view - particularly when you specify no specific error at this point. Perhaps if you actually stated your problem instead of comparing to the dozens of different ones I have seen people have applying the patch, someone may be able to suggest something. Do we have a patch for the patch? Again - ambiguity. Before you implied that you couldn't install the patch or that something is wrong. You never considered that it would be your specific system, perhaps something you have installed, something you haven't cleaned up, something you have turned off or removed to tweak the machine, etc. The link I originally gave you told you the specific known issues with the patch, but you obviously don't have one of those - amazingly in two posts, I still have no idea what your problem actually is. You say you can read, but can you actually present your problem in some fashion? As for the only other question I have seen you ask: "Can you really offer help or just attitude?" You want something that will clean up your system? Secure it? Keep you from getting problems like this in the future? Sure.. Here you go, I offer you the advice that has cleaned up likely hundreds of systems straight from these newsgroups. If none of these help in your situation, let us know (specifically) what you are seeing. If you have the SASSER worm, go to one of these places and read the instructions and get the tools to help you remove it: http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/sasser.asp and/or http://securityresponse.symantec.com...oval.tool.html and/or http://vil.nai.com/vil/stinger/ Expect more "spam" as you just posted the email address to millions of eyes and hundred (thousands?) of collection "bots" that will start sending you all sorts of interesting and possibly offensive material. Some will attempt to infect you with viruses, worms, trojans. Others will try to sell you something. Some will try to convince you of some elaborate scheme. Know that Microsoft does not send you patches via email, they do not send you links via email normally. They don't know you, don't know your computer and really, in this scenario, could care less. Sending emails to an individual is not Microsoft's style. Also, never open attachments in an email unless you not only know the person it was sent from, but knew in advance that they were sending it and you have also scanned it for viruses and your antivirus software is running happily in the background at the time you open it (updated antivirus, no less.) Always munge your address in the future. Suggestions on what you can do to secure/clean your PC. I'm going to try and be general, I will assume a "Windows" operating system is what is being secured here. UPDATES and PATCHES ------------------- This one is the most obvious. There is no perfect product and any company worth their salt will try to meet/exceed the needs of their customers and fix any problems they find along the way. I am not going to say Microsoft is the best company in the world about this but they do have an option available for you to use to keep your machine updated and patched from the problems and vulnerabilities (as well as product improvements in some cases) - and it's free to you. Windows Update http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/ Go there and scan your machine for updates. Always get the critical ones as you see them. Write down the KB###### or Q###### you see when selecting the updates and if you have trouble over the next few days, go into your control panel (Add/Remove Programs), match up the latest numbers you downloaded recently (since you started noticing an issue) and uninstall them. If there was more than one (usually is), install them back one by one - with a few hours of use in between, to see if the problem returns. Yes - the process is not perfect (updating) and can cause trouble like I mentioned - but as you can see, the solution isn't that bad - and is MUCH better than the alternatives. (SASSER/BLASTER were SO preventable with just this step!) Windows is not the only product you likely have on your PC. The manufacturers of the other products usually have updates as well. New versions of almost everything come out all the time - some are free, some are pay - some you can only download if you are registered - but it is best to check. Just go to their web pages and look under their support and download sections. You also have hardware on your machine that requires drivers to interface with the operating system. You have a video card that allows you to see on your screen, a sound card that allows you to hear your PCs sound output and so on. Visit those manufacturer web sites for the latest downloadable drivers fro your hardware/operating system. Always (IMO) get the manufacturers hardware driver over any Microsoft offers. On the Windows Update site I mentioned earlier, I suggest NOT getting their hardware drivers - no matter how tempting. Have I mentioned that Microsoft has some stuff to help secure your computer available to the end user for free? This seems as good of a time as any. They have a CD you can order (it's free) that contain all of the Windows patches through October 2003 and some trial products as well that they released in February 2004. Yeah - it's a little behind now, but it's better than nothing (and used in coordination with the information in this post, well worth the purchase price..) Order the Windows Security Update CD http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/cd/order.asp They also have a bunch of suggestions, some similar to these, on how to better protect your Windows system: Protect your PC http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/ FIREWALL -------- Let's say you are up-to-date on the OS (operating system) and you have Windows XP.. You should at least turn on the built in firewall. That will do a lot to "hide" you from the random bad things flying around the Internet. Things like Sasser/Blaster enjoy just sitting out there in Cyberspace looking for an unprotected Windows Operating System and jumping on it, doing great damage in the process and then using that Unprotected OS to continue its dirty work of infecting others. If you have the Windows XP ICF turned on - default configuration - then they cannot see you! Think of it as Internet Stealth Mode at this point. It has other advantages, like actually locking the doors you didn't even (likely) know you had. Doing this is simple, the instructions you need to use your built in Windows XP firewall can be found here: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=320855 If you read through that and look through the pages that are linked from it at the bottom - I think you should have a firm grasp on the basics of the Windows XP Firewall as it is today. But let's say you DON'T have Windows XP - you have some other OS like Windows 95, 98, 98SE, ME, NT, 2000. Well, you don't have the nifty built in firewall. My suggestion - upgrade. Me next suggestion - look through your options. There are lots of free and pay firewalls out there for home users. Yes - you will have to decide on your own which to get. Yes, you will have to learn (oh no!) to use these firewalls and configure them so they don't interfere with what you want to do while continuing to provide the security you desire. It's just like anything else you want to protect - you have to do something to protect it. Here are some suggested applications. A lot of people tout "ZoneAlarm" as being the best alternative to just using the Windows XP ICF, but truthfully - any of these alternatives are much better than the Windows XP ICF at what they do - because that is ALL they do. ZoneAlarm (Free and up) http://www.zonelabs.com/store/conten...eeDownload.jsp Kerio Personal Firewall (KPF) (Free and up) http://www.kerio.com/kpf_download.html Outpost Firewall from Agnitum (Free and up) http://www.agnitum.com/download/ Sygate Personal Firewall (Free and up) http://smb.sygate.com/buy/download_buy.htm Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall (~$25 and up) http://www.symantec.com/sabu/nis/npf/ BlackICE PC Protection ($39.95 and up) http://blackice.iss.net/ Tiny Personal Firewall (~$49.00 and up) http://www.tinysoftware.com/ That list is not complete, but they are good firewall options, every one of them. Visit the web pages, read up, ask around if you like - make a decision and go with some firewall, any firewall. Also, maintain it. Sometimes new holes are discovered in even the best of these products and patches are released from the company to remedy this problem. However, if you don't get the patches (check the manufacturer web page on occasion), then you may never know you have the problem and/or are being used through this weakness. Also, don't stack these things. Running more than one firewall will not make you safer - it would likely (in fact) negate some protection you gleamed from one or the other firewalls you ran together. ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE ------------------ That's not all. That's one facet of a secure PC, but firewalls don't do everything. I saw one idiot posting on a newsgroup that "they had never had a virus and they never run any anti-virus software. Yep - I used to believe that way too - viruses were something everyone else seemed to get, were they just stupid? And for the average joe-user who is careful, uses their one-three family computers carefully, never opening unknown attachments, always visiting the same family safe web sites, never installing anything that did not come with their computer - maybe, just maybe they will never witness a virus. I, however, am a Network Systems Administrator. I see that AntiVirus software is an absolute necessity. You can be as careful as you want - will the next person be as careful? Will someone send you unknowingly the email that erases all the pictures of your child/childhood? Possibly - why take the chance? ALWAYS RUN ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE and KEEP IT UP TO DATE! Antivirus software comes in so many flavors, it's like walking into a Jelly Belly store - which one tastes like what?! Well, here are a few choices for you. Some of these are free (isn't that nice?) and some are not. Is one better than the other - MAYBE. I personally love Symantec AV, but on some of my exchange servers, I have several different levels of protections/several different applications doing the protections - not to mention the AntiVirus software I install on my client machines. Sound paranoid? Good. It should. Symantec (Norton) AntiVirus (~$11 and up) http://www.symantec.com/ Kaspersky Anti-Virus (~$49.95 and up) http://www.kaspersky.com/products.html Panda Antivirus Titanium (~$39.95 and up) http://www.pandasoftware.com/ (Free Online Scanner: http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/) AVG 6.0 Anti-Virus System (Free and up) http://www.grisoft.com/ McAfee VirusScan (~$11 and up) http://www.mcafee.com/ AntiVir (Free and up) http://www.free-av.com/ avast! 4 (Free and up) http://www.avast.com/ Trend Micro (~$49.95 and up) http://www.trendmicro.com/ (Free Online Scanner: http://housecall.trendmicro.com/hous...start_corp.asp) Did I mention you have to not only install this software, but also keep it updated? You do. Some of them (most) have automatic services to help you do this - I mean, it's not your job to keep up with the half-dozen or more new threats that come out daily, is it? Be sure to keep whichever one you choose up to date! SPYWARE/ADWARE/POPUPS --------------------- So you must be thinking that the above two things got your back now - you are covered, safe and secure in your little fox hole. Wrong! There are more bad guys out there. There are annoyances out there you can get without trying. Your normal web surfing, maybe a wrong click on a web page, maybe just a momentary lack of judgment by installing some software packages without doing the research.. And all of a sudden your screen starts filling up with advertisements or your Internet seems much slower or your home page won't stay what you set it and goes someplace unfamiliar to you. This is spyware. There are a whole SLEW of software packages out there to get rid of this crud and help prevent reinfection. Some of the products already mentioned might even have branched out into this arena. However, there are a few applications that seem to be the best at what they do, which is eradicating and immunizing your system from this crap. Strangely, the best products I have found in this category ARE generally free. That is a trend I like. I make donations to some of them, they deserve it! Spybot Search and Destroy (Free!) http://www.safer-networking.net/ Lavasoft AdAware (Free and up) http://www.lavasoft.de CWSShredder (Free!) http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/downloads.html Hijack This! (Free) http://mjc1.com/mirror/hjt/ SpywareBlaster (Free!) http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/ The Cleaner (49.95 and up) http://www.moosoft.com/ Bazooka Adware and Spyware Scanner (Free!) http://kephyr.sureshot.xaviermedia.net/spywarescanner/ That will clean up your machine of the spyware, given that you download and install several of them, update them regularly and scan with them when you update. Some (like SpywareBlaster and SpyBot Search and Destroy) have immunization features that will help you prevent your PC from being infected. Use these features! Unfortunately, although that will lessen your popups on the Internet/while you are online, it won't eliminate them. I have looked at a lot of options, seen a lot of them used in production with people who seem to attract popups like a plague, and I only have one suggestion that end up serving double duty (search engine and popup stopper in one): The Google Toolbar (Free!) http://toolbar.google.com/ Yeah - it adds a bar to your Internet Explorer - but its a useful one. You can search from there anytime with one of the best search engines on the planet (IMO.) And the fact it stops most popups - wow - BONUS! If you don't like that suggestion, then I am just going to say you go to www.google.com and search for other options. One more suggestion, although I will suggest this in a way later, is to disable your Windows Messenger service. This service is not used frequently (if at all) by the normal home user and in cooperation with a good firewall, is generally unnecessary. Microsoft has instructions on how to do this for Windows XP here: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/p...e/stopspam.asp SPAM EMAIL/JUNK MAIL -------------------- This one can get annoying, just like the rest. You get 50 emails in one sitting and 2 of them you wanted. NICE! (Not.) What can you do? Well, although there are services out there to help you, some email servers/services that actually do lower your spam with features built into their servers - I still like the methods that let you be the end-decision maker on what is spam and what isn't. If these things worked perfectly, we wouldn't need people and then there would be no spam anyway - vicious circle, eh? Anyway - I have two products to suggest to you, look at them and see if either of them suite your needs. Again, if they don't, Google is free and available for your perusal. SpamBayes (Free!) http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/ Spamihilator (Free!) http://www.spamihilator.com/ As I said, those are not your only options, but are reliable ones I have seen function for hundreds+ people. DISABLE UNUSED SERVICE/STARTUP APPS ----------------------------------- I might get arguments on putting this one here, but it's my spill. There are lots of services on your PC that are probably turned on by default you don't use. Why have them on? Check out these web pages to see what all of the services you might find on your computer are and set them according to your personal needs. Yeah - this is another one you have to work for, but your computer may speed up and/or be more secure because you took the time. And if you document what you do as you do it, next time, it goes MUCH faster! Task List Programs http://www.answersthatwork.com/Taskl...s/tasklist.htm Black Viper's Service List and Opinions (XP) http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htm Processes in Windows NT/2000/XP http://www.reger24.de/prozesse/ There are also applications that AREN'T services that startup when you start up the computer/logon. One of the better description on how to handle these I have found here: Startups http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_content.php That's it. A small booklet on how to keep your computer secure, clean of scum and more user friendly. I am SURE I missed something, almost as I am sure you won't read all of it (anyone for that matter.) However, I also know that someone who followed all of the advice above would also have less problems with their PC, less problems with viruses, less problems with spam, less problems with spyware and better performance than someone who didn't. Hope it helps. |
|
#4
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia,
I hope you wont take offence at this-please remember,I have no way of knowing whether you are an advanced/intermediary/beginner.I would like to say that publicising your e-mail address on a web forum is an extremely ill-advised move. Mass-mailing virii such as Swen harvest addresses from here,as do spambots.Be prepared for a massive deluge of unsolicited mail/virii. If you could direct me to your original post,I'd be only too happy to see if I can offer any assistance.If you are too angry,then,if your problem is Spyware related,I'd suggest posting a HiJackThis!log at http://cexx.org for analysis. I'll bet you've been given the download site URL for HiJack This! already,but here it is,just incase: http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/index.html Good Luck-and for the record,Shenan is cool.It must take the patience of a saint to reply to the same problems over and over again. Sadie >-----Original Message----- >Patricia wrote: >> Yes, Mr. Expert. I did read all the information and I still have the >> same problem. I'm just an average senior and not an expert but I'm >> not stupid either. I do read and quite well in fact. Can you really >> offer help or just attitude? Feel free to e-mail some "simple" >> instructions. > >Perhaps if you responded to the original thread so we would know what you [..] |
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
Sadie wrote:
[..] > suggest posting a HiJackThis!log at [..] for > analysis. > I'll bet you've been given the download site URL for > HiJack This! already,but here it is,just incase: > > [..] > > Good Luck-and for the record,Shenan is cool.It must take > the patience of a saint to reply to the same problems > over and over again. Sadie, I have seen you do the same thing. You have shown great patience in the past as well. =) True enough - I blow off steam on occasion. My attitude is a bit looser than some in the groups, admitted - I try to stay calm most of the time. heh My answers Can seem a bit harsh, but most take it in stride as there is normally an answer thrown in to help them. The only problem I had with Patricia's original post was that nothing specific was posted, at least not that I could pick out. When you reado over the newsgroups enough, everything starts to run together, but there are enough subtle differences that you can never tell a problem without some specifics. Hopefully Patricia will come back with some more information on her problem and we can get this sorted out. In case not, this was the original post: "Everyone seems to be having the same problem that I have with the Sasser patch. How many times will it take for MS to see that their solution isn't accepted by their own system? Bummer!!!!!!Do we have a patch for the patch? Security update for XP KB835732" 5/4/2004 @ 11:56PM |
|
#6
|
|
|
|
|
Yes,Shenan,we cross-posted there.
I'd imagine the O.S is still infected with Sasser,and that's what is preventing the application of the patch. But,as you say,we wont know that unless Patricia posts back. 3.04 am,here in the U.K.!I'm off for a kip.keep up the good work! Sadie >-----Original Message----- >Sadie wrote: >> I hope you wont take offence at this-please remember,I >> have no way of knowing whether you are an >> advanced/intermediary/beginner.I would like to say that >> publicising your e-mail address on a web forum is an >> extremely ill-advised move. >> Mass-mailing virii such as Swen harvest addresses from >> here,as do spambots.Be prepared for a massive deluge of >> unsolicited mail/virii. >> >> If you could direct me to your original post,I'd be only >> too happy to see if I can offer any assistance.If you are >> too angry,then,if your problem is Spyware related,I'd >> suggest posting a HiJackThis!log at [..] for >> analysis. >> I'll bet you've been given the download site URL for >> HiJack This! already,but here it is,just incase: >> >> [..] >> >> Good Luck-and for the record,Shenan is cool.It must take >> the patience of a saint to reply to the same problems >> over and over again. > >Sadie, > >I have seen you do the same thing. You have shown great patience in the >past as well. =) > >True enough - I blow off steam on occasion. My attitude is a bit looser >than some in the groups, admitted - I try to stay calm most of the time. heh >My answers Can seem a bit harsh, but most take it in stride as there is >normally an answer thrown in to help them. > >The only problem I had with Patricia's original post was that nothing >specific was posted, at least not that I could pick out. When you reado >over the newsgroups enough, everything starts to run together, but there are >enough subtle differences that you can never tell a problem without some >specifics. > >Hopefully Patricia will come back with some more information on her problem >and we can get this sorted out. In case not, this was the original post: > >"Everyone seems to be having the same problem that I have with the Sasser >patch. How many times will it take for MS to see that their solution isn't >accepted by their own system? Bummer!!!!!!Do we have a patch for the patch? [..] |
|
#7
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia wrote:
> Yes, Mr. Expert. I did read all the information and I still have the > same problem. I'm just an average senior and not an expert but I'm > not stupid either. I do read and quite well in fact. Can you really > offer help or just attitude? Feel free to e-mail some "simple" > instructions. Shenan Stanley wrote: <snip> > Aha! You are the one who posted: > > "Everyone seems to be having the same problem that I have with the > Sasser patch. How many times will it take for MS to see that their > solution isn't accepted by their own system? Bummer!!!!!!Do we have > a patch for the patch? Security update for XP KB835732" </snip> Welp, got a response from Patricia - perhaps someone else can help... |
|
#8
|
|
|
|
|
This is all very helpful information and I am saving this post to refer back
on. Thanks for taking the time to post this. Janet "Shenan Stanley" <news_helper> wrote in message news:2532 [..] |
|
#9
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 7 May 2004 21:49:37 -0500, Shenan Stanley wrote:
> When I try to download the security patch, I get an error message that says > it is not supported by windows 32. I've been out of the loop for a few weeks so don't know all the history involved here ... However, this sounds like a message one would get if trying to install a patch for 64 bit XP on a system running 32 bit XP (what most of us are running). NOTE: If the MS "sasser" hotfix doesn't show up as available with the system scan at the main Windows Update site, it is probably already installed. |
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| reply to Shenan Stanley I'm not a computer wiz ! all i need some answers ,please simple annswers - not wop jargon |
|
| To Shenan Stanley I just wanted to commend you for that excellent reply to TBerk ( If Registry Cleaners are no good then ). It was the most intelligent opinion on Registry Cleaners that I have... |
|
| Shenan Stanley vies for longest Master Post title! FW from Security.Homeusers NG. |
|
| Hey Shenan Stanley re XP help I have been trawling the WNG* (is that right???) trying to figure out what everything means, while looking for info on downloading and installing SP2. I don't think I have... |
|
| Shenan Stanley R U around ??? Hi .. This is for Shenan could you email me pls ?? My email is paul2b ... If you remember who i was i ask you whether if i could use something from you and you say it was... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM. | Privacy Policy
|