|
#1
|
|
|
|
|
I'm thinking of going back to Linux on a PC for Firewalls
(I know what you are saying) But I remember using Smoothwall and thinking wow this is cool. I have yet to set up a Untangle Box, Just wondering if someone has one running or has bought a untangle device? Thanks Russ |
|
|
|
#2
|
|
|
|
|
"Russ (www.SBITS.Biz)" <support> wrote in message
news:3368 > I'm thinking of going back to Linux on a PC for Firewalls > (I know what you are saying) > But I remember using Smoothwall and thinking wow this is cool. > > I have yet to set up a Untangle Box, Just wondering if someone has one > running or has bought a untangle device? > I've been using it while testing SBS 2008. I have Server 2008 with just the Hyper-V role with Untangle and SBS 2008 in child partitions. As this is a test environment it's hard to say what performance would be like in the real world. From what I've seen so far I think this would be a viable one box solution with dual Xeons and lots of RAM. My test box only has a dual core Athlon and 8GB of RAM. It is definitely underpowered for this. Even so it could handle a small network of ten or less workstations if SQL isn't involved. I also haven't been able to test how it handles a significant email load. Once SBS 2008 RTMs I plan to setup a proper server with the same configuration and migrate my SBS 2003 domain to it. I'm happy enough with Untangle that I want to test it in real word situation. On it's own box I think it would easily be able to handle any traffic SBS could throw at it. |
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
Russ, I first heard about Untangle a couple of months ago in one of your
posts ;) I decided to give it a go and it is working very well in my small office with 10 users. I'm running it on a Dell SC440 with 2 GB ram, onboard NIC and a Intel Pro dual NIC. This is a fairly inexpensive setup and I believe it is way overkill for the number of users and load that I have. I have a 15MB/1.5 MB connection and bandwidth is not affected at all (I have all modules turned on except the spam module). I've seen people on their forums reporting using it with many hundreds of users. I ended up using the Pro (paid) version to take advantage of the AD integration which works well. I setup multiple "racks" to enforce per user web filtering/access policies. Unfortunately you cannot setup policies based on user groups, you have to go user by user. Also, "Live Support" is included with the $25 monthly fee. I called several times during my initial setup and each time I called the Untangle support was fantastic. They answered immediately and were able to help me with my setup. If you want you can also turn on the remote support module so that tech support can remote in to the Untangle box to help out. One of my concerns regarding using Untangle is what would happen if one of the programmers for one of the modules decides to go commercial, would Untangle have to remove that module? Or what would happen if Untangle is bought out by, say, Sonicwall? I read an article where one of the Untangle founders say they have received buy-out overtures from unnamed big name UTM vendors. I doubt Untangle would continue if that happened. -Dave "Russ (www.SBITS.Biz)" <support> wrote in message news:3368 [..] |
|
#4
|
|
|
|
|
downloaded the Utangle VM the other night.
My little test so far, it seems it could be a good solution for some options like the spam filter and proxy. The interface looks easy. The forums look pretty active also. Looking at the few video's it seems interesting. side note: We have been using PFSense while and have been very happy with it. (Not sure if you have looked at that one) ______________________________ Joseph Vito Bacino Jr DV Technical Solutions Inc. www.dvtechsolutions.com Russ (www.SBITS.Biz) wrote: [..] |
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
comment:
somehow I came across pfSense in the process of reading this thread, and possibly stuff from another forum, (I was not previously aware of it). Looking at the description has made me download the beast. "Joseph Vito Bacino Jr." <no-email> wrote in message news:1192 [..] |
|
#6
|
|
|
|
|
I don't want to hijack Russ's thread
But yes, It had been very nice. I took a look a long time ago and did not try it (for what ever reason) Saw Many people on a Asterisk forum mention PFSense...so i thought i would try. Here is an interesting post on how users have used PFSense... (two being Foxnews.com and Foxbusiness.com)which was cool... http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7668.0.html Sorry Russ... ______________________________ Joseph Vito Bacino Jr DV Technical Solutions Inc. www.dvtechsolutions.com SuperGumby [SBS MVP] wrote: [..] |
|
#7
|
|
|
|
|
PFSense WOW another one
Looking at the images it looks similar to SmoothWall (What's nice is it's low min requirements so you can grab any old PC) What I'm interested in the content filter and spam (OpenDNS is a good content filtering) but I have people that want to go by USER (Example Shipping doesn't need any search engines) Thanks Guys a lot of good information from you all Russ |
|
#8
|
|
|
|
|
it's ok
it looks similar to SmoothWall Express. (Simple clean with logs) Better logs than most Firewall especially when it comes to Retention. :) Russ |
|
#9
|
|
|
|
|
Few things Just off that bat..
here is a "FAQ" with some info... http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7001.0.html some nice Tutorials: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tutorials Quick Notes: The ISO you install on a pc can use packages (Squid, SquidGaurd) The embedded image, you can not use packages. ______________________________ Joseph Vito Bacino Jr DV Technical Solutions Inc. www.dvtechsolutions.com Russ (www.SBITS.Biz) wrote: [..] |
|
#10
|
|
|
|
|
I have 3 UT boxes (not VMs) installed at clients. It works very well. You
can't beat 14 free open source apps including antivirus and antispam. Steve "Russ (www.SBITS.Biz)" <support> wrote in message news:3368 [..] |
|
#11
|
|
|
|
|
THAT's What I'm thinking :)
Thanks Russ |
|
#12
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry can you describe how you setup the network adapters in Hyper-V so that
Untangle recognized them properly? I've done the install but can't get the NICs configured using legacy adapters. "Kerry Brown" <kerry*a*m> wrote in message news:1568 [..] |
|
#13
|
|
|
|
|
Dave wrote:
> > One of my concerns regarding using Untangle is what would happen if one of > the programmers for one of the modules decides to go commercial, would > Untangle have to remove that module? Or what would happen if Untangle is > bought out by, say, Sonicwall? I read an article where one of the Untangle > founders say they have received buy-out overtures from unnamed big name UTM > vendors. I doubt Untangle would continue if that happened. >The packages can never disappear. If by means of a lot of cooperation, (many co-authors and maintainers in most cases) one were taken closed-licence, that would not affect the existing versions. Someone would then continue development of the last free version, as all the packages are important, heavily-used ones. Only obsolete OS packages ever get abandoned. What happens to the whole thing depends on the licence of the system software. If that's GPL or equivalent, then the same applies, anyone can pick up the existing version and run with it. If it's something people still want, someone will. The GPL and its derivatives were specifically designed to prevent rights purchase and withdrawal of software. I would assume the extras in the Pro version are proprietary, but if there's demand, many people should be capable of cloning them. The OS package Samba has long had PDC capabilities, so basic AD operation is understood. |
|
#14
|
|
|
|
|
"SteveB" <newsgroup> wrote in message
news:4928 > Kerry can you describe how you setup the network adapters in Hyper-V so > that Untangle recognized them properly? I've done the install but can't > get the NICs configured using legacy adapters. > They just worked out of the box for me. I have installed Untangle several times and never had a problem with it recognising the NICs. I'm not where I can get at that computer right now but I do remember a glitch in the Untangle network configuration screen where it shows the NICs as not connected even though they were working fine. I just ignored what it said on the screen and configured the NICs. |
|
#15
|
|
|
|
|
A UTM Comparison
http://www.foundationstech.com/techn...utm-comparison I met the Calyptix guys at the SBSMigration conference in New Orleans and was quite impressed. They'll be at SMBNation if you're going to that, Russ. "Russ (www.SBITS.Biz)" <support> wrote in message news:a356 [..] |
|
|
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Thread | Thread Starter |
| Untangle, SBS 2003 R1 and Slow DNS We're running SBS 2003 R1. We're getting ready to upgrade hardware and software to SBS 2008. Since ISA is supposed to be on the SBS 2008 box, we've been looking at putting an... |
BrianB |
| Untangle and SBS 2003 R1 We've added an Untangle firewall server between the Internet (DSL modem) and our SBS 2003 R1 server. Something is not configured correctly and I haven't yet found an answer... |
BrianB |
| Untangle - re: Metavize FYI, Anyone used the "Untangle" (previously Metavize) product? Was forwarded the article linked below by one of my techs and seems like something I'll look into as there... |
MSR Consulting SBS Support |
| algorithm to untangle a graph Hi, Does anyone know of a good algorithm to untangle a graph? Or to be more precise: Does anyone know of a good algorithm that will determine the arrangement of vertices... |
grasp06110 |
| Untangle a mess I have looked until cross-eyed at this and cannot find the... |
Jeff C |
|
Privacy Policy | All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40 PM.
|
|
|