|
|
||||||
|
#1
03-01-04, 05:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Howdy!
I made update of my MDK 10.0 via cooker. Urpmi said it has to remove older OO in order to install newer one, I agreed. Then, I discovered I don't have OO at all. When trying to install it manually, it ends with: Installation failed: OpenOffice.org = 1.1 is needed by OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1-10mdk Anyone has a clue how to work around this one? |
|
|
|
#2
03-01-04, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Zbigniew A. wrote:
> When trying to install it manually, it ends with: > Installation failed: > OpenOffice.org = 1.1 is needed by OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1-10mdk > > Anyone has a clue how to work around this one? for -9 and -10 urpmi --allow-nodeps <rpms> however, there's -11 just uploaded which is supposed to have fixed the prob Mark |
|
#3
03-01-04, 06:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
"Zbigniew A." <Zbycho> writes:
]Howdy! ]I made update of my MDK 10.0 via cooker. Urpmi said it has to remove older ]OO in order to install newer one, I agreed. ]Then, I discovered I don't have OO at all. ]When trying to install it manually, it ends with: ]Installation failed: ] OpenOffice.org = 1.1 is needed by OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1-10mdk Yes, install both at once. Ie put the rpm files containing both OpenOffce and the english subset on the same rpm -Uhv line. |
|
#4
03-01-04, 07:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Unruh pon 1. marca 2004 19:35 wrote:
> "Zbigniew A." <Zbycho> writes: > > ]Howdy! > > ]I made update of my MDK 10.0 via cooker. Urpmi said it has to remove > older ]OO in order to install newer one, I agreed. > ]Then, I discovered I don't have OO at all. > > ]When trying to install it manually, it ends with: > ]Installation failed: > ] OpenOffice.org = 1.1 is needed by > OpenOffice.org-l10n-en-1.1-10mdk > > Yes, install both at once. Ie put the rpm files containing both > OpenOffce and the english subset on the same rpm -Uhv line. Thank you guys, both of you at once! :) Since I had all the packs in /var/cache/urpmi I didn't hunt for 1.1.-11 version, I used urpmi --allow-nodeps . It installed in no time. Sometimes even obvious solution are hidden, when one focuses on a problem instead of a solution. :-)) |
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Using OpenOffice x86_64 rpm from openoffice.org Hi, I am looking at trying to install the OpenOffice x86_64 rpm from openoffice.org. (will be version 3.0) What I'd like to know, before trying it, is whether I can install... |
|
| OpenOffice 2.0.4 I am a stand alone/home PC user and really only need a word processing program to compose documents. Microsoft Office is so expensive and I don't know if I need all if has to... |
|
| OpenOffice To digress a bit, pdftk seems to be just what I need. But, it doesn't seem to be available as a package or port for 6.0, at least not yet. This also seems to be true of... |
|
| OpenOffice 2.0 Hi Newsgroup, For a couple of days now I see the [..] webpage and it seems very much like the 2.0 version of the suite is released/complete/reliable-enough/etc. Also it... |
|
| Where to catch the pre-made ISO from COOKER Hi, which ftp-mirror is hosting the latest pre-made ISOs for Mandrake Cooker? The mirrors listed on the Mandrake Site "cookerdevel" doesn't seem to contain the ISOs. I would... |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM. | Privacy Policy
|
catch 22: OpenOffice 1.1 is neded by OpenOffice 1.1-10 (cooker)