|
#16
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all the replies - I can't seem to locate the RAM as I don't have
the desktop icon. "Daave" wrote: [..] |
|
|
|
#17
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks again for all the replies - are you really saying that a freeware scan
program would be better than McAfee or one of the other such as Norton etc. "Gerry" wrote: [..] |
|
#18
|
|
|
|
|
Ginnie wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies - I can't seem to locate the RAM as I > don't have the desktop icon. Try this: Right-click My Computer and select Properties. Now you will see how much RAM you have. Even if you don't have a desktop icon for My Computer, you can still get it by clicking the Start button. When you see My Computer, right-click on it and select Properties. |
|
#19
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, Those companies have forgotten what they have done best and have
attempted to become "everything" to eveyone. They have spread theirselves to thin and don't concentrate on one area effectively anymore. I consider both comanies products bad for they behave similar to the viruses they are supposed to protect you from. They take control of your system, make it run slow and keep prompting you to purchase their software constantly. This is what you don't want in the first place. |
|
#20
|
|
|
|
|
BTW: Here are some aternatives and some help to the situation
http://www.randem.cm/virusproblems.html |
|
#21
|
|
|
|
|
Ginnie
No software is 100% effective. However, I do not choose to criticise the detection rate of McAfee, or Norton for that matter. That is not the issue. The point is that the freeware alternatives can do as good a job at no expense without the system performance issues McAfee and Norton create. |
|
#22
|
|
|
|
|
Just today I replaced a McAfee install with Kaspersky 2009. A full
scan of the computer found 17 different infectors. Not a good score for a recent version of McAfee, fully updated. "Gerry" <gerry> wrote in message news:1916 [..] |
|
#23
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the problem that if one gets in it can disable the security
programe and then the others can get on board. Had McAfee been disabled? Was it McAfee Internet Security or the Anti-Virus? What was the infection that started the problem? |
|
#24
|
|
|
|
|
It was the Security suite. I'm not sure about when the problems
began. As with Norton, the uninstall required the McAfee tool to get the remnants off the PC. I didn't take the Kaspersky log with me but it was a common mix of infectors. Between the new AV/Malwarebytes and Windows Defender it's back online. The customer usually tips you off to infections with the comment "It takes forever ( or a long time ) for web pages to load." "Gerry" <gerry> wrote in message news:5540 [..] |
|
#25
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - I never had a problem with McAfee - just that my system was running
slow - from what I have read - I guess instead of renewing go to a free one - "Gerry" wrote: [..] |
|
#26
|
|
|
|
|
I found this software not to be free - gives trial subscription.
"R. McCarty" wrote: [..] |
|
#27
|
|
|
|
|
Computer is 4 years old - has 512 ram
"Gerry" wrote: [..] |
|
#28
|
|
|
|
|
Did he say it was free?
Ginnie wrote: [..] |
|
#29
|
|
|
|
|
No he didn't - guess assumed it was - just actually how does one know what
security program to subscribe to!!!! "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote: [..] |
|
#30
|
|
|
|
|
Programs always evolve and change. One example is AdAware. I used
to globally install it on machines. Now I use a mix of Windows Defender, MalwareBytes and Spybot Search & Destroy. Anti-Virus software is very difficult to choose. Many folks opt for a free product like AVG Free, Avast, ClamWin. Of the fee based ones I prefer Eset's NOD32, Kaspersky and BitDefender. McAfee & Norton ( Home ) are just living off their market share. In days gone by both were better than their current offerings. The same can be said for Roxio and Nero. In their days both were good Optical disk burning apps. These days they are both bloated and shabby. You can accomplish burning with apps like CD Burner XP Pro and one for .Iso's called ImageBurn for free. Part of the problem with software is marketing. Only the major players get shelf space at retail stores like Best Buy. ( Not that I would ever recommend Best Buy ). For customers who are looking for a product in a traditional box they don't get exposed to new & improved choices since many software products are distributed by web purchase and download. "Ginnie" <Ginnie> wrote in message news:2037 [..] |
|
|
|
|
| Similar Threads | |
| Problems running slow after update, IE but expecially running any I had accumulated about 30 updates before installing them. I only did NOT install 3 of them but gave the go ahead on all the others, mostly security updates, one defender,... |
|
| Another Windows running slow - too slow to use anymore I have seen a lot of posts here about windows running slow, and it has happened to me, too. It is at this point too slow to be useable. This is XP Home/ SP2, with all current... |
|
| Database is running slow after running DBCC Shrinkdatabase command We have SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition running on Windows 2000 Server. I ran the DBCC Shrinkdatabase command last week. Now, the database is slow when I open one of the work... |
|
| KB891711 IS RUNNING AND MY PC IS SLOW SLOW SLOW Yesterday I downloaded windows critical update KB891711 and today my PC is slow. I am on windows 98Se using Gateways mode 667 Pn ( 4 yeard old now)and 512 memory. I did... |
|
| computer running real slow with word running When I run Word 2002 xp my program is running real slow. Someone said word is using all my ram memory up. not sure if i need an update to fix this problem? I have 256K ram |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM. | Privacy Policy
|